Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2005-12-12 at 13:51 -0600, wayne wrote:

> Well, I can see coming back some day and trying to create an update to
> the SPF protocol.  I can't see trying to change SPF version 1.

The problem with SPF draft is there is no spf2.0/mfrom.  This has little
to do the IETF, but rather a proponent/author with the idea that SPF was
just a snap-shot, offering a new draft that embraced the same DNS record
for much of the same reasons, which suited a particular prolific vendor
that now claims IPR.  Fixing this mistake requires adding scope.  The
short cut of using a TXT record allowed getting the cart before the
horse.

-Doug


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]