Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



In <200512092141.NAA00720@xxxxxxxxxxx> Bob Braden <braden@xxxxxxx> writes:

> This thread has contained several suggestions that publication of
> an RFC in the Experimental category constitutes an "IETF experiment".

This is, in part, due to the directions of the IESG.  For example, the
IESG note that will be placed at the top of these drafts refer to
things like a two year observation period.  So, while there isn't
anything in RFC2026 that documents what the IESG has requested, I
don't think the "experiment" term is being thrown around quite as
loosely as might first seem.

Still, I think you are correct that this is not your typical
"experimental" RFC process and people should be careful not to read
too much into the term.


-wayne


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]