In <17305.36224.584090.853821@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "Dick St.Peters" <stpeters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Julian Mehnle writes: >> As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was >> submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that >> actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra". > > Perhaps you shouldn't have said that. Sendmail's sid-milter has used > v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August > 2004. I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I > believe it was well after August. draft-ietf-marid-protocol-03 was released on Sept 15th 2004, after the consensus of the working group was that the SPFv1 records should not be reused for SenderID. So, yeah, there was a few weeks where the Sendmail milter was within spec. -wayne _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf