Re: [spf-discuss] Re: Appeal: Publication of draft-lyon-senderid-core-01 in conflict with referenced draft-schlitt-spf-classic-02

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Julian Mehnle writes:
> As my appeal[1] pointed out, at the time draft-lyon-senderid-core-00 was 
> submitted for experimental status, there was no "running code" that 
> actually interpreted "v=spf1" as "spf2.0/mfrom,pra".

Perhaps you shouldn't have said that.  Sendmail's sid-milter has used
v=spf1 records for PRA checks since its initial release in August
2004.  I don't know the date for draft-lyon-senderid-core-00, but I
believe it was well after August.

--
Dick St.Peters, stpeters@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]