JFC (Jefsey) Morfin wrote: >>> He discusses an IETF langtag issue. >> Not that I'm aware of. > Why not to ask him? Good idea, what did he answer when you asked him before you claimed that "he discusses an IETF langtag" issue ? What I read here was his known position that using the same codepoints for Kanji and other scripts in Unicode is wrong. >>> the appeal now in limbo >> For now it's rejected, http://ietf.org/IESG/APPEALS/?C=M&O=D > Get your facts together. No problem, they announced it 11-15, and decided it at the begin of 64th IETF meeting, now more than a month ago: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.announce/9881> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.announce/9882> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ltru/4070> <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.ltru/4047> <https://datatracker.ietf.org/public/pidtracker.cgi?command=view_comment&id=41630> > You confuse cases. Your various RfC 3934 cases and appeals are rather boring from my POV, your RfC 3912 case is not yet "last called". > The denial of appeal Brian Carpenter just announced s/just/11-15/ I watch their "appeals" directory almost daily (for procedural reasons unrelated to you and language tags). > I did not want to "win", but to obtain the clarification > detailed in the text you can now read. s/now/11-15/ > I will appeal to the IAB to get a final guidance. Bookmark <http://www.iab.org/appeals/>. Bye, Frank _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf