Melinda Shore wrote:
ENUM's only reason is map E.164 numbers to URI's which in 99.9 % of the cases means VoIP.On 9/23/05 5:38 PM, "Dave Crocker" <dhc2@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ENUM's very existance is totally linked to the rest of the SIP applicaiton suite and as such needs to remain with the rest of those groups. But anyway, you'll note that I argued that "real-time" is an unsuitable name because of what it actually means, not that your definition of real-time was vernacular and we need to focus on what's actually real-time. I tend to prefer naming it something around multimedia applications but as long as whatever it is is reasonably descriptive and won't lead to people thinking that it's a proper place to work on things like storage device controllers, I'm good. I thought the original proposal was pretty good and needed little or no editing including hair splitting on what the name of the directorate should be. Real Time Applications is a pretty good descritpion of the general problem set or maybe "Death to the PSTN Directorate?" . can we just get on with it ? Melinda _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Richard Shockey, Director - Member of Technical Staff NeuStar Inc. 46000 Center Oak Plaza - Sterling, VA 20166 sip:rshockey(at)iptel.org sip:57141(at)fwd.pulver.com ENUM +87810-13313-31331 PSTN Office +1 571.434.5651 PSTN Mobile +1 703.593.2683 Fax: +1 815.333.1237 <mailto:richard(at)shockey.us> or <mailto:richard.shockey(at)neustar.biz> <http://www.neustar.biz> ; <http://www.enum.org> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf