> ----- Forwarded message from Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> ----- > > FYI: I am being threatened for posting operationally relevant > criticism of > mis-operation of the F DNS Root server on the DNSOP list. > > -- > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:55:20 -0700 > From: David Kessens <david.kessens@xxxxxxxxx> > To: Dean Anderson <dean@xxxxxxx> > Cc: David Meyer <dmm@xxxxxxxxx>, Rob Austein <sra@xxxxxxxxxx>, > Bert Wijnen <bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [david.kessens@xxxxxxxxx: Re: [dnsop] An attack that > DNSSEC would > have defended against...] > > > Dean, > > To avoid any misunderstandings: My message is an official warning to > you that I will propose to the IESG to remove your posting privileges > if I see one more abusive mail from you. > > Thanks, > > David Kessens > --- Since I have been informed that this actually is the forum for this discussion according to RFC 3683 I will ask for a clarification from David on this whole thing. David, the way it reads to me is you warned Dean you would go to the IESG if he continued what you felt were abusive posts. Dean in turn informed the IESG of your warning because he felt it was unwarranted and being used by you as a tool to silence someone who had a differing technical opinion. You then used his complaint to the IESG as an instance of another abusive post and requested to have his privileges removed. Is that basically correct? If so are you telling me that I have to be afraid of ever voicing a complaint or problem to the IESG because an AD can use that as a reason for retribution? This to me transcends Dean and whether or not his posts are abusive - I'd like to know (maybe someone else has the answer) if I can be penalized for lodging a complaint with the IESG. Thanks, Nick _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf