At 23:05 19/09/2005, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture " (LLAI) myself.
Do you conceptually accept in that wording that an OPES can be plugged in there, for example as part of a service to the exchange? The WG-OPES has worked on HTTP, and now on SMTP. IMHO OPES also fit pseudo-synchronous exchanges. In that case the WG-OPES should be able to dialog with the new area at a later stage.
jfc _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf