On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:35:58 -0400 Melinda Shore <mshore@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 9/19/05 4:23 PM, "Harald Tveit Alvestrand" <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I think all areas in the IETF are more-or-less defined as "core of the > > area" + "what is closely linked to the core" + "what fits less badly there > > than elsewhere" - ECRIT would come under "closely linked", since its > > subject area is use of the SIP-type services; GEOPRIV might be more > > characteristic of "fits less badly here than elsewhere" - it is used by > > many of the services like ECRIT, but is also used (or should be) by WGs in > > other areas. > > I think there may be a problem here in that "real time" may > suggest to a number of people a level of rigor in timing that's > really not applicable to much of the work the new area is It seems that on the Internet so called real time applications are generally either delay sensitive and / or Jitter intolerant. (Which are, of course, different things.) I guess I would go for "Low Latency Applications and Infrastucture " (LLAI) myself. Regards Marshall Eubanks > intended to cover. I'm enthusiastic about the area; > not so crazy about its name. > > Melinda > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf