Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Ned Freed <ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
From: Michael Thomas <mat@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 13:23:32 -0700
Authentication-results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=mat@xxxxxxxxx; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; );
Cc: david.kessens@xxxxxxxxx, "'IETF Discussion'" <ietf@xxxxxxxx>, iesg@xxxxxxxx, "'Eliot Lear'" <lear@xxxxxxxxx>, ietfdbh@xxxxxxxxxxx, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>, isms@xxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=269; t=1126730166; x=1127162366; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=mat@xxxxxxxxx; z=Subject:Re=3A=20[Isms]=20ISMS=20charter=20broken-=20onus=20should=20be=20on=20WG =20to=20fix=20it| From:Michael=20Thomas=20<mat@xxxxxxxxx>| Date:Wed,=2014=20Sep=202005=2013=3A23=3A32=20-0700| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=mv0bc/eGfw/exqznCy/VbBzrEHoWathz3FAn2HYwn57BvkAcqnfL2DNZY6Yz78c6s2wwkfDX wDQ3CSm7ZGVuQNhuZuQx0K51EWsmEom22vlNqvxNK6th1boaASGYhiOkyxjm+MQ0bsCQPt0cwaA oN4CH0V383AE8V3D/wjrDF7U=
In-reply-to: <01LSZP7AGR0Y000092@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913 Thunderbird/0.8 Mnenhy/0.7.2.0

Ned Freed wrote:

If I were to object to Eliot's proposal (I don't - in fact I stronglysupportit), it would be on the grounds that the IETF should be taking a longhard lookat the issues surrounding call home in general, not just in the specialcase of
SNMP.


I'll bite: what could the IETF do if it looked
long and hard?

		Mike

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Ned Freed

References:
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Sam Hartman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
  - From: Ned Freed

Prev by Date: Re: Fw: IETF Tools
Next by Date: Re: Fw: IETF Tools
Previous by thread: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
Next by thread: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]