Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Folks,

I've lost track of the procedures for formally taking exception to ad hominem attacks, but I think we (the IETF) are overdue in needing to get quite strict about enforcing that requirement, and doing the enforcement in a timely fashion.l

We simply must purge patterns of personal abuse out of our public discussions and start requiring professional demeanor.

It is not reasonable to burden every participant with the effort to install filters. A hostile work envrionment is not made tolerable by blinders and ear plugs.


d/


Dean Anderson wrote:
Mr Crocker. I know you'd rather not give credit to anyone you disagree
with, which I suppose leaves only a preference to plagarize the work of
others and give undue credit to someone else, say, Vixie [ala the SPF/RMX
plagarism in which Vixie was improperly credited for the idea and the real
contributors and the originator of the idea were improperly removed***]. However:


--

  d/

 Dave Crocker
 Brandenburg InternetWorking
 +1.408.246.8253
 dcrocker  a t ...
 WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]