Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 02:58:17PM +0000,
 Paul Vixie <paul@xxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 19 lines which said:

> yes, but only when some rfc reserves .local the way rfc1918 reserves
> the 10.in-addr.arpa and other names handled by AS112.  (IANA will,
> properly, refuse to add a .LOCAL NS RR pointing at AS112 or anywhere
> else until IETF reserves this name.)

In that direction (IANA waiting for IETF), I understand.

But what about the other direction? When IETF reserves a name, is it
always null-routed to AS112? It does not seem so, ".example" (RFC
2606), for instance, is not "delegated".

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]