On Tue, 30 Aug 2005, Margaret Wasserman wrote: > > The LLMNR document already includes an informative reference to > draft-cheshire-dnsext-multicastdns-05.txt, but it does so rather obscurely > (citing a need to use a TTL of 255 for "compatibility with Apple Bonjour"). That doesn't make sense. Why does LLNMR need to be compatible with a separate protocol? Tony. -- f.a.n.finch <dot@xxxxxxxx> http://dotat.at/ BISCAY: WEST 5 OR 6 BECOMING VARIABLE 3 OR 4. SHOWERS AT FIRST. MODERATE OR GOOD. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf