Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 19:31 28-08-2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
The IETF *is not in the business of* "document the contact point for problems concerning a domain". That duty is left to registry operators, who have a whole apparatus (ICANN) for making it possible to figure out how to do that. And they can ask to have such specs published as RFCs if they want to - it's been done before; examples include RFC 1875 ("UNINETT PCA Policy Statements"). But ICANN hasn't done that, so no policy related to any *current* domain administrator is on the record.

Thank you for the clarification. It is more informative than what is written in the draft.

Status UNKNOWN seems like a fine status to keep, in my opinion. Status INFORMATIONAL

That's my opinion too.

Regards,
-sm

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]