Re: Why have we gotten away from running code?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Singer wrote:
I hear the opposite complaint enough to believe that the truth lies somewhere in between ("the ietf is dominated by academics who have no idea what it takes to design, deploy, and maintain large complex networks"). I only see a tiny portion of the ietf myself, agreed (I doubt many people see much more as it is so large), but I don't see reason to be excessively pejorative about the attendance I see. It's mixed; academics, industrial engineers, writers, thinkers, implementers, observers, dilettantes, all mixed in. Just like other standards orgs.

I think that's right. However, what may well be missing in the mix
is input from people who actually deploy and operate our stuff, and
live with its limitations and quirks every day. We need to understand
the indirect consequences of our choices: not "can it be coded and will
it interoperate?" but "will it drive service providers and users crazy?"

    Brian




At 18:36  +0200 10/08/05, Simon Josefsson wrote:

I think that is a good point.  A variation on that theme is that the
IETF is no longer run by people who actually implement protocols.  The
relevance and impact of the IETF on what is actually used on the
Internet is marginalized through that change of membership.  The
attitude of "That is not how we do things in the IETF" make people go
away.

Cheers,
Simon

C Wegrzyn <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

 I think a big part of the issue is that the IETF has been taken over
 little by little by corporate interests. Before it used to be for the

 > "love of doing it". Today it is more for "the benefit of one".





_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]