I think that is a good point. A variation on that theme is that the IETF is no longer run by people who actually implement protocols. The relevance and impact of the IETF on what is actually used on the Internet is marginalized through that change of membership. The attitude of "That is not how we do things in the IETF" make people go away. Cheers, Simon C Wegrzyn <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I think a big part of the issue is that the IETF has been taken over > little by little by corporate interests. Before it used to be for the > "love of doing it". Today it is more for "the benefit of one". > > Chuck Wegrzyn > > Marc Manthey wrote: > >> morning experts, >> >> >>> (Note that I haven't implemented any IETF protocols myself, but I >>> did once do an implementation of a badly designed protocol.) >> >> >> ahhhh, is this why you think that there is no need for any new or >> old protocol at all ? >> >> have a great day >> >> marcM. >> >>------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Ietf mailing list >>Ietf@xxxxxxxx >>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf