On Aug 10, 2005, at 6:36 PM, Simon Josefsson wrote:
I think that is a good point. A variation on that theme is that the IETF is no longer run by people who actually implement protocols. The relevance and impact of the IETF on what is actually used on the Internet is marginalized through that change of membership. The attitude of "That is not how we do things in the IETF" make people go away. Cheers, Simon
hell o , yes it is,simon , all , see i am the oppossite, a i highly motivated undergraduated citizen. with no money But i learn a lot in the last 2 year only by reading lists and try to understand what the real problem is or could be. I can´t do a lot, just raise an issue
or have a meaning. But its fantastic to be part of the whole thing. just my 2 cents marcM. from old germany;-P
C Wegrzyn <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:I think a big part of the issue is that the IETF has been taken over little by little by corporate interests. Before it used to be for the "love of doing it". Today it is more for "the benefit of one". Chuck Wegrzyn Marc Manthey wrote:morning experts,(Note that I haven't implemented any IETF protocols myself, but I did once do an implementation of a badly designed protocol.)ahhhh, is this why you think that there is no need for any new orold protocol at all ?
--" The mind, once expanded to the dimensions of larger ideas, never returns to its original size."
Les Enfants Terribles www.let.de
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf