On Wed, 2005-08-10 at 15:25 -0400, Henning Schulzrinne wrote: > The next SIPit event is in about a month; see http://www.sipit.net/ > > There was a GIMPS (now GIST) + NSIS NSLP interop event just before the > IETF meeting (pre-RFC). > > I wish there were more, but there are some. The NSIS interop was co-located with IPFIX/NetFlow9 & NetConf, as can be found at: http://www.ist-mome.org/events/interop/ The IPFIX interop resulted in a 30 min presentation/discussion during the wg meeting and also solved quite a number of ambigues issues and uncovered some things that many people might do wrong while making the implementation. IPFIX is not in last call yet either, but having this interop for sure improved the quality of the document a lot. IMHO "Running Code" is a good thing, doing an interop before going to last-call is even better. Thus, as mailed before, 2 seperate interoperating implementations would be a good thing to have, not only to take care of all the ambiguities, it also makes sure that the document will actually be used and is not yet-another-paper... Greets, Jeroen (who likes to actually implement things, not write about it ;)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf