on 2005-06-16 01:53 Henning Schulzrinne said the following: > Henrik Levkowetz wrote: > >> Sounds like a good idea. However it requires direct integration with the >> tracker, which means that the tools team can't just put up a prototype, > > Not really - one could associate the WGLC with just the draft name, and > use that name as the key into the tracker. A similar approach could be > used to track charter deadlines. That won't feed the WGLC information into the tracker, which was the most salient point of Jeffrey's idea, I thought. Without that, you're left with something close to what I first described. Henrik _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf