Henrik Levkowetz wrote:
Sounds like a good idea. However it requires direct integration with the
tracker, which means that the tools team can't just put up a prototype,
Not really - one could associate the WGLC with just the draft name, and
use that name as the key into the tracker. A similar approach could be
used to track charter deadlines.
the way we've put up the tools.ietf.org/wg/<wg> pages.
I've added this to the tool suggestions page,
http://tools.ietf.org/wiki/ToolSuggestions
Henrik
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf