Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > In message <1115166744.5285.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ralph Droms writes > : > > >>So, without meaning any offense to the ADs, I suggest we lump random >>participants, WG members, doc editors and ADs together when the spec is >>reviewed - and ensure that all comments are published in the same forum >>and given appropriate weight based on technical merit, as supported by >>explanatory text when the comments are published. > > > > Then what? How are the comments resolved? Who makes the final > decision about whether or not a document has met certain standards? "Rough consensus and running code" Even at this level. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf