Keith Moore wrote: >>At the same time for each AD there is more than one person in the >>IETF who is more technically astute than that AD. > > perhaps. however, it's hard to identify those people, They're the ones disagreeing with the ADs in some cases ;-) > and they may not > have either the time/energy or neutrality that are required to do final > review. Neutrality is a two-way street; it is required for ADs too, and they, just like individuals, have had (and continue to have) their pet perspectives. > if they do, they're free to put their names in the hat for the > next NOMCOM. So the message is "get your employer to ante 80% of your time to the IETF, or keep your expertise to yourself"? NOMCOM descisions are not a lottery where you win the right to have your input count more. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf