Steve - Final decision is made as it is today; proposed change is timing and context for review... - Ralph On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:28 -0400, Steven M. Bellovin wrote: > In message <1115166744.5285.25.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ralph Droms writes > : > > >So, without meaning any offense to the ADs, I suggest we lump random > >participants, WG members, doc editors and ADs together when the spec is > >reviewed - and ensure that all comments are published in the same forum > >and given appropriate weight based on technical merit, as supported by > >explanatory text when the comments are published. > > > Then what? How are the comments resolved? Who makes the final > decision about whether or not a document has met certain standards? > > > > --Prof. Steven M. Bellovin, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/~smb _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf