> On 4/7/2005 10:36, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote: > > Regardless of the interesting side-discussion about 'voting', > > what the toy shows after about a day is: > > > > prefer nroff: 8 > > prefer xml: 37 > > neither: 9 > I wonder how many of those have actually written a draft using both? Let's see. I've done lots of drafts with both, using (in the nroff case) several different macro packages. I have also produced several very large non-RFC documents (in the thousand page range) using XML, nroff, and a variety of other tools. XML is the hands-down winner IMO. In fact I now use xml2rfc routinely for non-IETF-related documents of various sorts. Ned P.S. Anyone who uses an XML editor that requires mouse use which gets in the way of simply entering text is using a crap tool. Plenty of alternatives exist that work properly. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf