-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Carl Malamud wrote: > Hi - > > I think a research request to study how protocols are designed and features > added over time deserves a more accurate answer than an official > incantation of "they're gone." Is this more "official": Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress." > Try this site: > http://www.watersprings.org/ > > You'll find all drafts and diff's between them. You'll find copyright violations too. There are copies of drafts that predate changes to I-D copyright; further, though the IETF reserves the right to post expired drafts under current rules, I'm not aware that watersprings.org has acquired permission from the IETF to do so. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVqjnE5f5cImnZrsRAiINAJ4h9KOLSSH3uUDmvMtIgKzz8e19FwCeKzJe IxPY4gfw/8ySXNkJFEwn5g8= =7/jF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf