-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Scott W Brim >>Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 14:27 >> >>On 4/7/2005 10:36, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote: >> >>>Regardless of the interesting side-discussion about 'voting', >>>what the toy shows after about a day is: >>> >>>prefer nroff: 8 >>>prefer xml: 37 >>>neither: 9 >> >>I wonder how many of those have actually written a draft using both? Do you prefer poking your eye with a stick or a pencil? Just because these are output formats doesn't mean we should have to write a draft using them. Or do you also write code in executable object format? > I have! and I clearly prefer xml I have too, which is why I revised the Word template. I hope to figure out how to get it to generate XML soon, which I consider an otherwise irrelevant output format. I don't care about the output, so long as I can generate it easily from a reasonable editor. Joe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFCVqfVE5f5cImnZrsRAo89AJ9w2HMftbnavgRGZnFt+f9LogFKUQCfV6kw w34PH6nLSQNVJ0sGLF+dPHU= =0yaF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf