Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' t o Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Scott W Brim
>>Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 14:27
>>
>>On 4/7/2005 10:36, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote:
>>
>>>Regardless of the interesting side-discussion about 'voting',
>>>what the toy shows after about a day is:
>>>
>>>prefer nroff: 8
>>>prefer xml:  37
>>>neither:      9
>>
>>I wonder how many of those have actually written a draft using both?

Do you prefer poking your eye with a stick or a pencil?

Just because these are output formats doesn't mean we should have to
write a draft using them. Or do you also write code in executable object
format?

> I have! and I clearly prefer xml

I have too, which is why I revised the Word template. I hope to figure
out how to get it to generate XML soon, which I consider an otherwise
irrelevant output format. I don't care about the output, so long as I
can generate it easily from a reasonable editor.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCVqfVE5f5cImnZrsRAo89AJ9w2HMftbnavgRGZnFt+f9LogFKUQCfV6kw
w34PH6nLSQNVJ0sGLF+dPHU=
=0yaF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]