Re: [Tools-discuss] Re: Last Call: 'Requirements for IETF Draft Submission Toolset' to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 6 Apr 2005, Bruce Lilly wrote:
A text editor -- any text editor -- suffices for nroff source.  That
includes vi, emacs, textpad (MS Windows), SiED (PalmOS), etc.  In
theory, there exist commercial XML editors for PalmOS, but I suspect
thay they are less productive than the ones on other platforms.
[...]

The biggest problem with XML editors is that they are unproductive.
Editing XML in all of the ones I've seen goes something like:

1. hunt for mouse
2. move cursor to nondescript icon and click
3. try to figure out what it is
4. type a few characters of text
5. go to step 1

I can't understand why you basically say that nroff can be typed manually, but XML requires an editor.


I've never used an XML editor and have.. what, a couple of dozen drafts, many of them RFCs already. I've used solely xml2rfc for about 1.5 years now. Nor do I have plans to use an XML editor.

Prior to XML I used custom nroff macros which I also edited manually.

A good text editor is your friend. That applies equally to nroff and xml2rfc. For those who want fancy (but maybe not user-friendly) WYSIWYG editors, those exist but are definitely not required.

--
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]