I now have this text:
<t>
The IAOC is expected to determine what IETF
administrative functions are to be performed, and how or
where they should be performed (e.g., internally to the
IASA or by outside organizations), so as to maintain an
optimal balance of functional performance and cost of
each such function.
The IAOC should document all such decisions, and the
justification for them, for review by the community. Each
function should be reviewed on a regular basis, using the
assumption that the function is unnecessary and that, if
necessary, it is overstaffed, rather than an assumption
that anything that has been done is necessary, and
adjusted as needed.
</t>
<t>
The IAD is responsible for negotiating and maintaining
contracts (or equivalent instruments) with outside
organizations as well as providing
any coordination necessary to make sure the IETF
administrative support functions are covered properly.
All functions (those contracted to outside organizations
as well as those performed internally in the IASA)
must be clearly specified and documented with
well-defined deliverables, service level agreements,
and transparent accounting for the cost of such functions.
</t>
The first para is as proposed by John Klensin, the 2nd para has
been adjusted to use same terminology as first para.
It is in my edit buffer now.
Is that acceptable to everyone?
Bert
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf