Rough consensus on no change? #786 Firing the IAOC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Version -04 says the following about firing IAOC members:

  IAOC members are subject to recall in the event that an IAOC member
  abrogates his or her duties or acts against the best interests of the
  IETF community.  Any appointed IAOC member, including those appointed
  by the IAB, IESG or ISOC Board of Trustees, may be recalled using the
  recall procedure defined in RFC 3777 [RFC3777].  IAOC members are
  not, however, subject to recall by the bodies that appointed them.

The procedure in RFC 3777 calls for recalling members one by one. John very clearly made the point that if the IAOC collectively behaves in a bad way, the community may be better off firing the whole group than in trying to find "the guilty party" among the members.

After a long debate, I conclude that John is the only proponent for changing this paragraph to have other rules for recall than RFC 3777 has - other people thought that we should live with the text as written.
So I call a rough consensus for "no change".


Are people willing to live with that?

                 Harald



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]