Re: Rough consensus on no change? #786 Firing the IAOC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Wednesday, 19 January, 2005 14:24 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Version -04 says the following about firing IAOC members:
> 
>    IAOC members are subject to recall in the event that an
> IAOC member
>    abrogates his or her duties or acts against the best
> interests of the
>    IETF community.  Any appointed IAOC member, including those
> appointed
>    by the IAB, IESG or ISOC Board of Trustees, may be recalled
> using the
>    recall procedure defined in RFC 3777 [RFC3777].  IAOC
> members are
>    not, however, subject to recall by the bodies that
> appointed them.
> 
> The procedure in RFC 3777 calls for recalling members one by
> one. John very clearly made the point that if the IAOC
> collectively behaves in a bad way, the community may be better
> off firing the whole group than in trying to find "the guilty
> party" among the members.
> 
> After a long debate, I conclude that John is the only
> proponent for changing this paragraph to have other rules for
> recall than RFC 3777 has - other people thought that we should
> live with the text as written.
> So I call a rough consensus for "no change".
> 
> Are people willing to live with that?

I have given up and I accept this outcome.  I hope the rest of
you turn out to be right or, better, that the problem never
arises.

   john



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]