RE: Rough consensus? #425 3.5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Harald writes:

> I suggested on Jan 13, replacing the last 3 paragraphs of section 3.4:
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 3.5 Decision review
> 
> In the case where someone questions a decision of the IAD or the
> IAOC, he or she may ask for a formal review of the decision.
> 
> The request for review is addressed to the person or body that made
> the decision. It is up to that body to decide to make a response,
> and on the form of a response.
> 
> The IAD is required to respond to requests for a review from the
> IAOC, and the IAOC is required to respond to requests for a review
> of a decision from the IAB or from the IESG.
> 
> If members of the community feel that they are unjustly denied a
> response to a request for review, they may ask the IAB or the IESG
> to make the request on their behalf.
> 
> Answered requests for review and their responses are made public.
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Can we live with this?
> 

I can

Bert
>                          Harald

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]