--On 14. januar 2005 12:13 -0800 Ted Hardie <hardie@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If so, I think that is a reasonable approach. If you want to leave it up to ISOC discussion to determine whether a resolution is sufficient, I suggest the following:
NEW:
2.5 Effective Date for Commencement of IASA
The procedures in this document shall become operational after this document has been approved by the process defined in BCP 9 [RFC2026] , including its acceptance as an IETF process BCP by the ISOC Board of Trustees, and the ISOC Board of Trustees has confirmed by appropriate means its acceptance of ISOC's responsibilities under the terms herein described.
That would work for me - except that it leaves it somewhat unclear who decides what's "appropriate".
Even more wordsmithing:
2.5 Effective Date for Commencement of IASA
The procedures in this document shall become operational
after this document has been approved by the process defined in
BCP 9 [RFC2026] , including its acceptance as an IETF process BCP
by the ISOC Board of Trustees, and the ISOC Board of Trustees
has confirmed its acceptance of ISOC's responsibilities
under the terms herein described.Removing "by appropriate means" means that when judging whether the IASA has commenced or not, we have to evaluate the content of ISOC's statement, and not its form. I think it will be a board resolution.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf