I couldn't find an example of a resolution that accepts an IETF procedure BCP without such a clause, but I probably missed it... an amendment to the BCP that says ".... and has been affirmed by a resolution of the ISOC Board of Trustees that accepts ISOC's responsibilities as described in this document" would appear to be consistent with previous practice.
Since this is a little context free, can I confirm that you mean this:
OLD:
2.5 Effective Date for Commencement of IASA
The procedures in this document shall become operational immediately after this document has been approved by the process defined in BCP 9 [RFC2026] and has been affirmed by a resolution of the ISOC Board of Trustees.
NEW:
2.5 Effective Date for Commencement of IASA
The procedures in this document shall become operational immediately
after this document has been approved by the process defined in
BCP 9 [RFC2026] and has been a affirmed by a resolution of the
ISOC Board of Trustees that accepts ISOC's responsibilities as described
in this document.
If so, I think that is a reasonable approach. If you want to leave it up to ISOC discussion to determine whether a resolution is sufficient, I suggest the following:
NEW:
2.5 Effective Date for Commencement of IASA
The procedures in this document shall become operational
after this document has been approved by the process defined in
BCP 9 [RFC2026] , including its acceptance as an IETF process BCP
by the ISOC Board of Trustees, and the ISOC Board of Trustees
has confirmed by appropriate means its acceptance of ISOC's responsibilities
under the terms herein described.
regards, Ted
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf