Re: Suggest no change: #739 Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





--On 13. januar 2005 13:23 -0600 Pete Resnick <presnick@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

However, I don't think there was any disagreement (including from Brian)
that text needed to be added of the form:

"This BCP will take effect upon adoption of the BCP by the IESG and the
concurrent <<insert thing that ISOC does which codifies in some
interesting way the adoption of the relationship by ISOC>>"

To be clear: I think that for <<insert thing that ISOC does>>, we should have what is currently in the BCP:


2.5  Effective Date for Commencement of IASA

  The procedures in this document shall become operational immediately
  after this document has been approved by the process defined in BCP 9
  [RFC2026] and has been affirmed by a resolution of the ISOC Board of
  Trustees.

I have not been convinced by the argument that we need something else.

                        Harald

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]