Re: draft-phillips-langtags-08, process, specifications, "stability", and extensions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bruce Lilly scripsit:

> I believe that John meant sect. 2.5 of RFC 3066, which does indeed
> mention a matching algorithm.

Yes.

> However, the proposed changes in the
> structure of tags interact badly with that algorithm.

It just makes the algorithm imperfect; however, it was imperfect before as well.

-- 
John Cowan    http://www.ccil.org/~cowan   <jcowan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
    "Any legal document draws most of its meaning from context.  A telegram
    that says 'SELL HUNDRED THOUSAND SHARES IBM SHORT' (only 190 bits in
    5-bit Baudot code plus appropriate headers) is as good a legal document
    as any, even sans digital signature." --me

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]