> Date: 2005-01-05 10:33 > From: ned.freed@xxxxxxxxxxx > > Section 2.5 (2.4.1 in the draft) states the matching rule in a succinct > > fashion. ÂEverything in 2.4.2 is a non-normative elaboration of this. > > ??? Which in no way refutes my assertion that no matching rule algorithm > was given in RFC 3066! I believe that John meant sect. 2.5 of RFC 3066, which does indeed mention a matching algorithm. However, the proposed changes in the structure of tags interact badly with that algorithm. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf