Scott, On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 20:14, ext Scott Bradner wrote: > thanks to Jonne for bringing this up - I agree that some text about this > should be in the document but I disagree on what it should say. > > imo - the IAOC members should not be compensated for their time but > I think its reasonable for them to be reimbursed for expenses for > travel to meetings not held in the same place and time as IETF > meetings (or just before or after an IETF at the same location) - since > I would hope that almost all of the work of the IAOC shoudl be done > over the net or by phone I would not think this would come up > that often but it might during startup (revaluating RFP responses > for example) - doing this enables peopel who do not have strong > money support to still be able to be on the IAOC I admit that I maybe have too much a view point of someone working for a relatively large company. I try to approach this from a position where the IAOC itself does not become a significant cost for IASA. However, as these are the people that are responsible for setting the budget and supervising the finances of the IASA and there is no real owner to control the expenses it would be clearer to have the IAOC members being responsible for their own expenses. If we would decide to reimburse traveling I think we cannot make the distinction between meetings co-located with IETF or not. There will always be people to argue that they wouldn't or couldn't come to the IETF and travel to IAOC meetings during the IETF should also be reimbursed. Cheers, Jonne. > > Scott > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf -- Jonne Soininen Nokia Tel: +358 40 527 46 34 E-mail: jonne.soininen@xxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf