inline > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > sob@xxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: Monday, December 13, 2004 14:23 > To: harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; sob@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 3.4 - IAOC > Decision Making > > > Harald sez: > > I don't think the IAOC should be completely paralyzed by > > one member being on > > holiday, ill or for other reasons unable to participate. > > nor do I, and my suggestion does not cause that - my suggestion says > that if you want a majority vote then the majority is of all current > members of the IAOC not of some subset that happen to show up > at a meeting > > > This is usually handled by quorum rules. I think the IAOC > > should set those (and publish them). > > Bert asked about that and I think that having quorum rules is fine - > but I'm assuming that most IAOC decisions will be made electonically > rather than face to face so I do not think that establishing a quorum > for face to face (or telephony) meetings changes the number that > the determination of a majority vote works on - basically I'm > saying that the IAOC should work on the same rules IETF WGs do and > verify decisions on their mailing list (if one or more members > miss a face to face or telephone meeting) > So what if one specific IAOC member has gone out in the woods for heaven knows how long. Bert > Scott > > > =----- > > Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 05:50:09 +0100 > From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: Scott Bradner <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-02: section 3.4 - IAOC > Decision Making > > --On 12. desember 2004 20:38 -0500 Scott Bradner > <sob@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > open from last version > > > > I think it must be made clear that all IAOC decision making involves > > all IAOC members then in office - not just a subset that > might show up > > at a meeting or on a phone call > > > > maybe add: "All IAOC decision making includes all IAOC > members then in > > office." > > I cannot find a previous message from you with the word > "subset" in it, but > you may have used some other phrase - but I disagree with > your proposal; I > don't think the IAOC should be completely paralyzed by one > member being on > holiday, ill or for other reasons unable to participate. > > This is usually handled by quorum rules. I think the IAOC > should set those > (and publish them). > > Harald > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf