--On Friday, 17 December, 2004 22:31 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> --On fredag, desember 17, 2004 11:56:43 -0500 John C Klensin
> <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>> But I think the old-standards team can take RFC 1269 off the
>>> list with a note saying "obsoleted by
>>> draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, no action necessary".
>>
>> Harald,
>>
>> Sorry, but I've got a procedural problem with this.
>
> You're right, of course.
> It should be "Under active development, as evidenced by
> draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, which has been approved by the IESG".
That would be fine, thanks.
Although I would encourage taking anything off the list that a
WG is even looking at, rather than requiring that the WG and
IESG be substantially finished with it.
john
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf