--On fredag, desember 17, 2004 11:56:43 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
But I think the old-standards team can take RFC 1269 off the list with a note saying "obsoleted by draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, no action necessary".
Harald,
Sorry, but I've got a procedural problem with this.
You're right, of course.
It should be "Under active development, as evidenced by draft-ietf-idr-bgp4-mib, which has been approved by the IESG".
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf