Well, the choice to put this on the ietf-discuss list was deliberate: including making sure that a reasonable cross section of the IETF would see the discussion. It's not at all clear that such a cross section would bother to subscribe to a new mailing list (and a new mailing list often just attracts the people who are interested for the wrong reasons).
In my personal opinion, it would be better to leave the discussion here at least until the last call on the BCP is done. At that point, we'll be into implementation, and if there are further matters to discuss, it would be reasonable to say "we are now into implementation phase, people who are interested can subscribe <here>".
Also, the threads are pretty easily identifiable (and skippable).
Again -- IMO.
Leslie.
Michael StJohns wrote:
The IASA, AdminRest et al discussions appear to be proceeding well, but perhaps it might make sense to craft a mailing list specifically for those discussions ? Its possible the recent (last 2 week) upswing in the number of related posts to the ietf mailing list will die down shortly, but my guess is not.
Later, Mike
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
"Reality:
Yours to discover."
-- ThinkingCat
Leslie Daigle
leslie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
-------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf