-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Leslie Daigle wrote: | | Well, the choice to put this on the ietf-discuss list was deliberate: | including making sure that a reasonable cross section of the IETF | would see the discussion. It's not at all clear that such a cross | section would bother to subscribe to a new mailing list (and a new | mailing list often just attracts the people who are interested | for the wrong reasons). | | In my personal opinion, it would be better to leave the discussion | here at least until the last call on the BCP is done. At that point, | we'll be into implementation, and if there are further | matters to discuss, it would be reasonable to say "we are now into | implementation phase, people who are interested can subscribe <here>". | | Also, the threads are pretty easily identifiable (and skippable).
Indeed. I'd much rather see the various NAT tro^H^H^Hdiscussions go to the apropriate place. The restructuring discussion is important for the community as a whole. This is exactly imo why we have an ietf list.
MVH leifj -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBuYOS8Jx8FtbMZncRAqJfAKC8Aj64LM8q3rwzOgRQklTQW/g70QCgukBh YX2p9ezahwO6N42mY3FI+bc= =FW6B -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf