Done > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > Harald Tveit Alvestrand > Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 10:20 > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Consensus? Variance > > > After reviewing the discussion on this topic, I think the > rough consensus > is conformant with this suggestion: > > - Remove the 2nd ("Disclaimer:") paragraph from section 5 > > - Insert the following as part of section 3 (I suggest just > before section > 3.1): > > If the IASA is unable to comply with the procedures > described in this > document for legal, accounting or practical reasons, the > IAOC shall report > that fact to the community, along with the variant > procedure it intends to > follow. If the problem is a long-term one, the IAOC shall > ask the IETF > to update this document to reflect the changed procedure. > > (Comparision to previouis suggestion: I changed "here" to "in this > document" to make sure it covers the whole BCP, not just the > section it > appears in. I also changed IAOC to IASA in the third word - > if the IAD is > unable to comply with procedures, IAOC is responsible for > reporting that to > the community, too.) > > (Note: A deviation from procedures without appropriate > justification is > certainly an action of the IAOC that can be appealed. See > next message.) > > OK? > > Harald > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf