At 05:23 PM 11/16/2004, James M. Polk wrote...
>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-farrel-rtg-morality-requirement s-00.txt
>
>I do not see why this ID should be limited to the Routing area...
Morals exist at layer 3, and are therefore related to Routing.
Ethics exist at layer 2, perhaps you would like to submit an RFC covering switching ethics?
I'm sure I can drum one up
(Self-preservation and enlightened self-interest are layer 1, and are self-defining)
seems like these conflict with the known layers 8 (politics) and 9 (religion) - so I believe we'll need an agreeable scope for layer 1 after all...
cheers, James
*******************
Truth is not to be argued... it is to be presented
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf