On Thu, Oct 21, 2004 08:56:15PM +0300, Pekka Savola allegedly wrote: > On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, Scott W Brim wrote: > > Is there anything in this message that disagrees with 3668? 3668 is a > > little more "nuanced", for example you don't have to disclose until it > > looks like your idea is going to be incorporated in something headed > > towards standards track, but generally I think what you describe is how > > things work now. > > Please do NOT spread that kind of total misinformation. > > You have to disclose your IPR as soon as reasonably possible when an > internet-draft or RFC potentially infringing on it has been published, > no matter the category it's headed. True. I was replying in the standards track context. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf