On Fri, 15 Oct 2004, Brian Rosen wrote:
You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first use" clauses, do you?
Is there a "preferred" wording for it?
I think you'll find virtually identical wording on this topic in several well-known licenses:
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.html
http://www.eclipse.org/legal/cpl-v10.html
http://www.opensource.org/licenses/afl-2.1.php
- RL "Bob"
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf