Re: Shuffle those deck chairs!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 13 Oct 2004, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
> Sam Hartman <hartmans@xxxxxxx>:
> > I think it would be wonderful if the free software community could
> > come to a consensus about what their requirements are. 

FWIW, I tried to initiate this dialogue a couple of times, the latest 
on Feb/Mar 2004, but as I received no response from FSF/OSS community, 
I gave up.

> That's not hard.  We need licensing conditions that don't require us
> to either pay royalties or sign legal papers, and which don't
> inhibit re-use of the code by restricting the area of application.

Hmm.. Being an OSS/FSF enthusiast myself, I'm not sure if the last
requirement, about code re-use, is a strict requirement.  Sure, it
would be nice if there wasn't such a thing, but it would seem to be
better to get the first two points and fail at the third than get
nothing at all.

I mean, if I was writing code that would be under a patent, and free
usage rights were granted for interoperability with a standard only,
I'd just write a big fat warning in the code segment and the README
file warning that don't copy my code to some completely unrelated
project unless you know what you're doing.

Which clauses of OSS/FSF licenses does "no re-use" infringe?

-- 
Pekka Savola                 "You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy                    kingdom bleeds."
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]