You guys don't have a problem with the "defensive suspension"/"no first use" clauses, do you? Is there a "preferred" wording for it? Brian > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of > Eric S. Raymond > Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 10:56 PM > To: Sam Hartman > Cc: Florian Weimer; ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: Shuffle those deck chairs! > > Sam Hartman <hartmans@xxxxxxx>: > > I think it would be wonderful if the free software community could > > come to a consensus about what their requirements are. > > That's not hard. We need licensing conditions that don't require us > to either pay royalties or sign legal papers, and which don't inhibit > re-use of the code by restricting the area of application. > -- > <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a> > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf