[Last-Call] Re: [Ntp] Re: Re: Last Call: Status Change of NTPv2 and NTPv3 to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I agree: 5905 needs a bis before it should be considered for advancement. I wouldn't opposed advancing a well-written bis, but I'd prefer to to ship an NTPv5, let it bake as a proposed standard for a decade, and then revisit the issue.

 

I also agree.

 

The standards-track status of 5905 does not seem to have any effect on its deployment and utility to the Internet. Let’s focus on the future.

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux