I support this proposed action. Is it also reasonable to consider advancing 5905 to Internet Standard? Regards, Brian On 12/2/24 1:53 PM, The IESG wrote:
The IESG has received a request from an individual participant to make the
following status changes:
- RFC1119 from Internet Standard to Historic
(Network Time Protocol (version 2) specification and implementation)
- RFC1305 from Draft Standard to Historic
(Network Time Protocol (Version 3) Specification, Implementation and
Analysis)
The supporting document for this request can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ntpv2-ntpv3-to-historic/
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final
comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the
last-call@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2024-12-30. Exceptionally, comments may
be sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the beginning
of the Subject line to allow automated sorting.
The affected documents can be obtained via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1119/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1305/
IESG discussion of this request can be tracked via
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/status-change-ntpv2-ntpv3-to-historic/ballot/
_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list -- ietf-announce@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ietf-announce-leave@xxxxxxxx
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
